# IntMath Newsletter: Newton’s Method, Desmos activities

By Murray Bourne, 30 Jul 2015

30 Jul 2015

In this Newsletter:

1. New interactive graph: Newton's Method

2. Newton's Method, accuracy and floating point numbers

3. Resource: Desmos Activities

4. Math puzzles

5. Math movie: Talks for people who hated math in high school

6. Final thought: Success often means failure first

## 1. New interactive graph: Newton's Method

## 2. Newton's Method, accuracy and floating point numbers

While producing the above graph, I came across the usual inaccuracies that arise when floating point numbes are involved.

YouTube engineers faced a problem as the number of views for Gangnam Style approached 2 billion. I found related issues when developing the Newton's Method graph. |

## 3. Desmos Activities

Desmos is one of the best free online graphing tools. Apart from allowing you to graph functions easily via an intuitive math input system, it's also possible to add sliders to graphs (allowing you to explore the effect of changing parameters). You can graph tables of data and also produce quadratic and exponential regressions.

Desmos is also available on iOS and Android devices.

### The Activities

The teacher-designed math activities provide situations where students can learn math vocabulary and concepts, in a visual context.

For example, in the Polygraph activities, one student chooses a specific graph (e.g. a parabola passing through 2 points on the |

It's a great way to engage students by getting them involved in **talking about** math, and **asking questions **about math.

Another interesting one is Water Line, where students need to figure out the graph of height versus time for filling various container shapes with water. This is good for developing essential **mathematical modeling** skills.

## 4. Math puzzles

The puzzle in the last IntMath Newsletter asked what was wrong with two protractors.

Partially correct answers were given by Pavithra, V T, Abhijit, Sudha, Zhuqi and Paul.

Here is a more detailed analysis.

### Both Protractors

The first problem with both of the protractors is they are not transparent. It is possible to make a metal or plastic one without being transparent, but it makes it harder to use. The angle you are measuring has to be at least the length of the radius of the protractor, otherwise you have to extend the arms of the angle. As a manufacturer, you need to decide where to place the origin point. Both protractors had errors.

### The Blue Protractor

In this case, the origin point is placed at the bottom middle of the protractor. This is good in that we can place that point on our angle's vertex. But the 0° and 180° markings should be in line with that origin point. The blue one fails in this respect. The only angle that will be correctly measured is 90°.

I took the photo of the protractor and overlaid it in my image editing software. I then measured the angles as follows.

One would expect 0° to be the most inaccurate, then as the angles get bigger, the error should reduce. However, it wasn't even a linear relationship. You can actually see the gap from 30° to 40° is larger than the rest.

All in all, a distrastrous measuring instrument.

### The Red Protractor

The key problem with this protractor is that it's impossible to see the vertex of the angle you are trying to meaure (or construct).

You would need to drill a hole at the point P for it to work properly. Once you've done that, the angles should be reasonably accurate.

Of course, the manufacturer should have drilled a hole there. No wonder the students made many mistrakes while using these protractors!

### New math puzzle

Find 3 integers that form a geometric progression if their sum is 21 and the sum of their reciprocals is 7/12.

Leave your responses here.

## 5. Math movies - Talks for people who hated math in high school

## 6. Final thought: Success often means failure first

[Image source: Allposters]

Basketballer Michael Jordan, regarded as one of the greatest basketballers of all time, had this to say about his success.

I've missed 3000 shots. Twenty-six times the game-winning shot has been trusted to me, and I've missed. I've lost over 300 games. I've failed over and over and over again, and that is why I've succeeded. [Michael Jordan]

Until next time, enjoy whatever you learn.

See the 16 Comments below.