# IntMath Newsletter: Pedigrees, resources

By Murray Bourne, 30 Jun 2015

30 Jun 2015

In this Newsletter:

1. Pedigree collapse

2. Resource: eMathHelp

3. Resonant frequency example

4. Math puzzles

5. Math movie: How equal do we want the world to be?

6. Final thought: What employers care about

## 1. Pedigree collapse

How many ancestors do you have? All of us have 2 parents, 4 grandparents and 8 great grandparents. But does this go on forever? See: |

## 2. Resource: eMathHelp

eMathHelp is a useful collection of calculators, math lessons and practice questions, with topics ranging from pre-algrebra to differential equations.

The calculators allow you to enter your own problem, and provide clearly explained step-by-step solutions, including some color-coding to make it even easier to follow.

There's also an Online Graphing Calculator, which is quite versatile.

eMathHelp appears to be one of the better free math resources.

## 3. Resonant frequency example: London's Millennium Bridge

I recently enjoyed a trip to the UK. Of course, I was always on the lookout for items of mathematical interest.

For the millennium celebrations in 2000, London built the Millennium Footbridge. It spans the River Thames between St Paul's Cathedral and the Tate Modern art gallery.

London Millennium Footbridge, from St Paul's Cathedral

On opening day in June 2000, participants in a Save the Children charity walk complained of vibrations in the bridge.

It was a classic case of a suspension bridge experiencing swaying due to resonant frequency. This is the same phenomenon that allows a singer to break a wine glass just with their voice. (See this quite funny lecture where they try it out.)

As the 1000 participants walked across the bridge, their individual small vibrations tended to encourage others to walk "in tune" to maintain balance, resulting in a positive feedback loop. That is, they began to march in sync, in a lateral (sideways) sense. At its center, the bridge's sideways movement was about 75 mm at 1 Hz. [Source]

There was also a band playing at the head of the participants. I wonder if the tempo of their music had any effect in this situation.

After a few days of restricted access, the authorities closed the bridge altogether, and it took 2 years to fix the problem.

The solution involved the installation of around 90 dampers that reduce both lateral and vertical movement.

Fluid-viscous dampers (at bottom), controlling horizontal movement.

One earlier study following a similar experience on a German footbridge concluded that:

The lateral sway of a person’s centre of gravity occurs at half the walking pace. Since the footbridge had a lowest lateral mode of about 1.1 Hz, the frequency of excitation was very close to the mean pacing rate of walking of about 2 Hz. [Source]

### Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse

When I first heard about the London case, I wondered why the designers had not incorporated lessons learned from the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse in 1940.

However, it was a different situation. In that case, mechanical sideways forces were not the cause of the initial excitation of the bridge. It swayed so much due to aeroelastic flutter, and eventually collapsed.

Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse (image source)

See video of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse.

## 4. Math puzzles

The puzzle in the last IntMath Newsletter asked about the length of a helix.

Correct answers with explanation were given by Jaff and Thomas.

**Entering math in comments: **I added a feature to make math entry on tablets or phones easier. You can use "qq" for the delimiter, since it's easier to type than the back-tick.

**I messed up: **Unfortunately, I had an incorrect number in that question. The circumference should have been 4 cm, not 3. This makes the problem a little easier, since we'll have a set of 3-4-5 triangles.

### New math puzzle

In the Museum of the History of Science in Oxford, I came across these 2 protractors which had been collected by a mathematics teacher.

The teacher noticed his students were making incorrect angle measurements, and when he looked more closely at the protractors they were using (made in China in the mid-1990s), he found some serious flaws.

What's wrong with each protractor, and what angle would give the maximum error in each case? Can you estimate that error, based on the photos?

Leave your responses here.

NOTE 1: The protractos were actually circular, but appear elliptical in the photos due to parallax error.

NOTE 2: China's manufacturing expertise has dramatically improved since the time these were made.

## 5. Math movie - How equal do we want the world to be? (Dan Ariely)

## 6. Final thought: What employers care about

Here's something I wrote for a training session recently. If we want to develop graduates who are useful for the workplace, we need to think about how to develop their skills, not just their knowledge.

Employers don't care what graduates know. They care more about what graduates can do with what they know, and their attitude to doing it.

Until next time, enjoy whatever you learn.

See the 7 Comments below.

30 Jun 2015 at 6:49 pm [Comment permalink]

the blue protractor gives the maximum error. because the origin point and 180 line were not in the same line.

30 Jun 2015 at 7:39 pm [Comment permalink]

Hello, Murray!

Thank you for mentioning my resource eMathHelp.

Cheers!

30 Jun 2015 at 11:13 pm [Comment permalink]

I think the second protractor is okay.

Coming to to the first protractor, I find that it is highly defective; however 90 degrees can be correctly measured by this very defective instrument. Approximately five degrees each on either side above the base straight line are left out and the the remaining space of approximately 170 degrees is divided into 180. Consequently one degree in the defective protractor is only 170/180 = 17/18 of a degree. So 10 degrees measured by this defective protractor will be 5 + [10 x 17/18] degrees. Curiously enough, 90 degrees measured by the defective protractor will be 90 degrees [ 5 + (90 x 17/18) = 5 + 85 = 90]

1 Jul 2015 at 12:43 pm [Comment permalink]

The red protractor have compressed scale on left hand side. So its difficult to come to the exact angle while taking measurement of an angle.

One may read false angle:

Actual angle : possible Angle read in a false way

70 101

60 1201

50 1301

40 401

20 1601

10 17

6 Jul 2015 at 6:35 pm [Comment permalink]

in the first one 180 degree is not marked in horizontal way.

15 Jul 2015 at 5:56 am [Comment permalink]

I only found the flaw with the blue one

the blue one could be wrong when measure the straight angles. because the line is not straight

16 Jul 2015 at 5:54 am [Comment permalink]

Well, it must be at least the fact that the center is not at the border of the protractor.

That means you cannot put the angle summit precisely on a point you've just drawn (because the plastic is not transparent).

On the blue protractor it's actually drawn on the border but the angle is not flat as it should, it is probably because the ends of this angle are not in a line with the summit.