# What did Euclid really say about geometry?

By Murray Bourne, 06 Dec 2010

In school, we all learn about points, lines, 2-D and 3-D shapes, and number theory (prime numbers, etc.)

Sometimes we are told what we are learning is “according to Euclid”, but we don’t learn very much about where it all comes from.

I recently came across a translation of Euclid’s *Elements* and enjoyed skimming through it (I don’t claim to have read all of it – it’s over 500 pages!) It is a remarkable collection of knowledge from the 3rd century BCE.

## Euclid’s Elements

Euclid constructing a straight line.

You can see the modern translation of Euclid’s original here:

(This PDF has a lot of blank pages at the beginning.)

Euclid’s *Elements* is the oldest and most famous mathematical textbook of all time. It forms the basis of much of the mathematics we learn in schools to this day.

The *Elements*, contrary to popular belief, wasn’t original work by Euclid since most of the theorems were by other Greek mathematicians (Aristotle, Eudoxus of Cnidus, Plato, Pythagoras). However, Euclid’s contribution was to arrange the axioms, theorems and corollaries in a logical order such that it was easy to reference. He also wrote some of the proofs.

Another misconception is that the Elements is only about geometry. In fact, there is a great deal about number theory as well.

Euclid demonstrated that all the geometrical theorems found in the *Elements* follow from 5 simple axioms:

Definitions

1. A point is that of which there is no part.

2. And a line is a length without breadth.

3. And the extremities of a line are points.

4. A straight-line is (any) one which lies evenly with points on itself.

5. And a surface is that which has length and breadth only.

Euclid believed you couldn’t prove things by measurement – you had to prove them mathematically.

There are 13 Books in the *Elements*. Some of them are:

1. Fundamentals of Plane Geometry Involving Straight-Lines

2. Fundamentals of Geometric Algebra

3. Fundamentals of Plane Geometry Involving Circles

…

5. Proportion (probably by Eudoxus – includes irrational numbers) (see p135 for proportion diagram)

…

7. Elementary Number Theory (probably from School of Pythagoras)

…

11. Elementary Stereometry (3-D geometry)

…

13. The Platonic Solids

The five regular solids—the cube, tetrahedron (i.e., triangular pyramid), octahedron, icosahedron, and dodecahedron — were problably discovered by the school of Pythagoras. They are generally termed “Platonic” solids because they feature prominently in one of Plato’s dialogues.

## Definitions

The English translation has liberal sprinklings of the following terms and I wanted to make sure I knew the differences between them:

*Element* – the essential principles

*Postulate* – a basic principle; a true statement that does not need to be proved

*Common Notion* – a unit of knowledge

*Proposition* – a proved and often interesting result, but generally less important than a theorem.

*Corollary* – a statement that follows with little or no proof required from an already proven theorem.

*Lemma* – a proved statement that is used as a stepping stone leading on to other more significant results

I hope you enjoy looking through Euclid’s *Elements* as much as I did. It is a remarkable book.

[You may also be interested in What did Newton say about Integration?.]

See the 4 Comments below.

10 Dec 2010 at 7:56 am [Comment permalink]

I think Euclid’s Elements is a wonderful book that should be read for pleasure at some time in one’s life. Two or three comments: a) to my limited knowledge, Aristotle made no contribution to the contents of Euclid’s book (perhaps his only claim to fame in Mathematics and science is having hindered its development for many centuries); b) the definitions quoted in the newsletter are just that: definitions. The actual starting point of euclidean geometry are the Postulates; the axioms correspond to common notions; c) the reference given to the Elements is Heiberg’s edition, which has the great merit of being bilingual; however, Professor D. Joyce has produced a better instrument, viz. [link no longer available] which has interactive features and very useful comments in the text.

10 Dec 2010 at 9:33 am [Comment permalink]

Thanks for the clarifications, Tomas.

Also, that link to the interactive explanations of the Elements is great!

13 Jan 2011 at 4:57 pm [Comment permalink]

Hi

Thnks a lot. Whatever informations you r providing in this site, all of them r very useful for me nd my students.

Thank you again.

13 Jan 2011 at 7:22 pm [Comment permalink]

You’re welcome, Zubaida – glad you find it useful!