# Is the Gateway Arch a Parabola?

By Murray Bourne, 06 May 2010

The Gateway Arch in St Loius, Mo., USA, is part of the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial.

The shape of the arch certainly looks like a parabola, but is it?

The Gateway Arch, St Loius, USA [Image source]

We’ll model the arch using a parabola and see how well it fits.

I drew a set of x-y axes and a regular grid on top of the photograph.

Next, I determined the values of y for x ranging from -3 to 3. We can see the resulting points (in magenta color) in the next image.

So my aim is to find the parabola that passes through the Origin (0, 0) and the points (-3, -4) and (3, -4). (I choose these for convenience).

I know the equation for my parabola will have a negative in front, since it is inverted (upside-down).

I can find the equation for this parabola in several different ways. One is to recall the general form for a parabola:

y = ax2 + bx + c

We have 3 points and 3 unknowns, so we just substitute them in:

Substituting (0,0) gives:

0 = 0 + 0 + c

So c = 0.

Next, substitute (-3, -4) and (3, -4) to give 2 equations in 2 unknowns:

-4 = 9a − 3b (1)

-4 = 9a + 3b (2)

-8 = 18a

So a = −4/9

Substituting this back into either (1) or (2) gives:

b = 0

So the parabola we are looking for is:

$y=-\frac{4}{9}{x^2}$

Here is the graph of that parabola.

It looks quite good. It passes through the Origin and the points (-3, -4) and (3, -4). But how does it match up with the Gateway Arch?

Here is the parabola next to the points we found above (when x = -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3):

Our parabola has missed going through the other points (the ones where x = -2, -1, 1 and 2)!

Comparing our parabola to the photo, we can see (especially near the waterline at the bottom) the shape of the arch is not really a parabola at all.

## Another Curve Needed

The Finnish-American designer of the Gateway Arch, Eero Saarinen, knew that a parabola was not the best shape for such an arch.

Arches have been used throughout history for bridge and roof supports, since they are good at directing forces downwards, rather than outwards, thus reducing the chance of collapse.

An arch shape that is often used is the catenary.

A catenary is the shape made by a chain that is freely hanging between 2 supports.

Chain hanging on a log. [Image source]

Paper chains [Image source]

## Catenaries

A caternary is an interesting curve. It is the average of the y-values of an exponentially decreasing curve and an exponentially increasing curve.

A simple example is:

$y=\frac{e^{-x}+e^{x}}{2}$

The first part of the numerator, e−x, decreases exponentially as x increases, while the second part, ex, increases exponentially as x increases. (See more on exponential curves.).

Here are the two curves on the same set of axes.

We add the y-values of the 2 exponential curves together and divide by 2 (in other words, we find the average of the y-values) to give us our simple catenary (in black) .

Let’s now compare the shape of a catenary (in black) to the shape of a parabola (in magenta).

We see they are not quite the same, and perhaps we are getting somewhere.

## [Aside] Cosh

This is not important for this discussion but there is another way of writing the equation we’ve just been discussing.

$y=\frac{e^{-x}+e^{x}}{2}$

This is an example of a hyperbolic function and you may meet the notation cosh later. It is called "cosh" because in some ways, it behaves similarly to the "cosine" function from trigonometry. The “h” in “cosh” comes from “hyperbolic”.

We can write:

$y=\cosh{x}=\frac{e^{-x}+e^{x}}{2}$

See more on hyperbolic functions.

Back to the topic.

## Flattened Catenaries

Now, a catenary is the shape we see when there is a chain of constant thickness hanging between 2 fixed points. (The word “catenary” comes from the same word as “chain”.)

But if the chain is thinner in the middle, it has a slightly different shape (it is flatter). Since the Gateway Arch is thinner at the top than it is near the base, the architect chose a flattened catenary, whose equation has the form:

Now, in our example there will be a negative in front of our equation (since the catenary is inverted) and we also will need to add A to our equation so the curve passes through (0,0) (otherwise it will pass through (0, -A)).

So we are looking for an equation of the following form, that passes through (-3, -4) and (-2, -1.42):

Using a computer algebra system, we solve the above system of equations and obtain the following equation.

Here is the plot of that curve superimposed on the Gateway Arch (in light green). The parabola we found earlier (in magenta) is there for comparison. We can see our catenary follows the shape of the bridge quite closely, especially at the bottom.

## Conclusion

This article has shown the Gateway Arch is not a parabola. Rather, it is in the shape of a flattened catenary, which is the shape we see if we hang a chain that is thin in the middle between two fixed points.

We have also seen how to go about modeling curves to find the equation representing such curves.

### 13 Comments on “Is the Gateway Arch a Parabola?”

1. Jessy George says:

This is really intersting am going to share with my students ,as they can adapt this method to check

Thank you Murray

2. Farzin says:

Very interesting. I always thought it was a parabolla.

Thanks

3. Rina King says:

Thanks a ton for this Rika! It is a great example to show learners why in science we need to show a directly proportional relationship,ie resolve it into a straight ine – any other relationship cannot be assumed.

4. Anah says:

We just finished a project in calculus II. The subject was to find the best model for the cumulative new cases of AIDS and the epidemic curve in the US. I wonder if there is an ideal model taking into account different factors such as geographic, bio…Ifsomeone has an idea, I will be interested.

5. Murray says:

Hi Anah. This earlier article may help you: H1N1 and the Logistic Equation.

6. payal says:

Thanks for the information.I have learned lot many new things from this article.I would be happy if you send me more such information.
Thanks again

7. rishabh says:

really very interesting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

8. abramovich says:

interesting indeed

9. harold2 says:

I really appreciated it!
Congratulations for this excellent post!

Thank you. I have learned a lot. I thought it was a parabola…nice..

11. Nikki says:

Thank you. I was recently reading a book that described my beloved Arch as a “Half-parabola.” That can’t be right, I thought, I don’t believe the Arch is a parabola at all, and it certainly isn’t a half of one. You have confirmed my suspicions. Thank you.

12. ?mega£ither says:

D: great, now I have to tell my awesome 7th grade algebra honors teacher she’s wrong (advanced class)