Arguing to Learn

By Murray Bourne, 30 Dec 2005

"Confronting Cognitions in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments"
Volume 1, Andriessen, J., Baker, M., and Suthers, D. (Ed) Kluwer Academic Publishers, ©2003.

arguing to learn

Summary Review

We do not learn much by just listening to a teacher. We learn more by:

  • Solving relevant, challenging and interesting problems
  • By teaching others
  • By having to defend a point of view

The book Arguing to Learn describes several experiments that used computer-based discussion environments to promote learning by argument.

The authors demonstrate how literacy levels improve when students are required to discuss controversial topics on-line. Nothing new there, but many of the experiments required students to argue a view that they did not personally hold, a situation that often occurs in a formal debate. The students found value in seeing things from other points of view. There was also value in having a well-structured learning environment, rather than a free-for-all chat session.

In Jermann and Dillenbourg's paper, students were required to complete a set of questions in pairs. They were required to agree on an answer and to state reasons why. There was a noticeable improvement in the quality of their answers because of the ensuing argument/discussion.

Some thoughts on this:

  • We don't use argument enough in classrooms because we are so busy trying to cover the curriculum
  • We are afraid of confrontation in the classroom and tend to minimise disagreements (a lost opportunity)
  • How would argument-based learning work in an Asian context, where the important cultural elements are harmony and group concensus?

Learning by argument has a lot of potential and is something that is not utilised enough in e-learning. Food for thought...

See the 1 Comment below.

Leave a comment

Comment Preview

HTML: You can use simple tags like <b>, <a href="...">, etc.

To enter math, you can can either:

  1. Use simple calculator-like input in the following format (surround your math in backticks, or qq on tablet or phone):
    `a^2 = sqrt(b^2 + c^2)`
    (See more on ASCIIMath syntax); or
  2. Use simple LaTeX in the following format. Surround your math with \( and \).
    \( \int g dx = \sqrt{\frac{a}{b}} \)
    (This is standard simple LaTeX.)

NOTE: You can't mix both types of math entry in your comment.

Search IntMath, blog and Forum