Math of drugs and bodies (pharmacokinetics)
By Murray Bourne, 01 Feb 2010
Pharmacokinetics is the process whereby substances (like food and drugs) are ingested into the body (via mouth or needles) and processed. We'll concentrate on drugs.
Preparing a syringe.
The process of pharmacokinetics has 5 steps:
- Liberation - the drug is released from the formulation.
- Absorption - the drug enters the body.
- Distribution - the drug disperses throughout the body
- Metabolism - the drug is broken down by the body.
- Excretion - the drug is eliminated from the body.
Of course, each drug needs to act on the body in a different way. Some drugs need to be absorbed quickly (like nitroglycerin if we are having a heart attack) and preferably eliminated quickly (otherwise toxins build up in the blood). For other drugs, we want slow absorption so we get maximum benefit and don't lose a lot of it from excretion.
So when your doctor prescribes (say) "take 2 tablets 3 times a day after food", this is based on the desirable levels of drug concentration and known levels of distribution, metabolism and excretion in the body.
What's the math?
When the nurse first administers the drug, the concentration of the drug in the blood stream is zero. As the drug moves around the body and is metabolized, the concentration of the drug increases.
There comes a point when the concentration no longer increases and begins to decline. This is the period when the drug is fully distributed and metabolism is taking place. As time goes on, the drug concentration gets less and less and falls below a certain effective amount. Time to take some more pills.
We can model such a situation mathematically with a differential equation. It has 2 parts - an absorption part and an elimination part. At first, absorption (increasing drug concentration) takes precedence and over time, elimination (decreasing concentration) is the most important element.
We have the following variables:
D = drug dose given
V = volume distributed in the body
C = concentration of the drug at time t
F = fraction of dose which has been absorbed (also called bioavailability)
A = absorption rate constant
E = elimination rate constant
t = time
Absorption part: This depends on the amount of the drug given, the fraction that has been absorbed and the absorption rate constant. It decreases as time goes on. The expression for absorption is given by:
A × F × D × e^{-At}
Elimination part: The elimination dynamic is affected by the elimination constant, the volume distributed in the body and the concentration left of the drug. The expression for this part is:
E × V × C
For our model, we need to subtract the elimination part from the absorption part (since the absorption part increases the concentration of drug and the elimination part decreases it). Our differential equation is as follows:
We now substitute some typical values for our variables (without units to keep things simple. Note C is a variable (not a constant here), the one for which we seek an expression in t.)
Solving this differential equation (using a computer algebra system), gives the concentration at time t as:
C(t) = 533.3(e^{−0.4t} − e^{−0.5t})
We can see in the graph the portion where the concentration increases (up to around t = 2) and levels off. The concentration then decreases to almost zero at t = 24.
Pharmacokinetics is yet another interesting "real life" application of math.
[Based on: A First Course in Pharmacokinetics.
Photo credit: Syringe]
See the 27 Comments below.
2 Feb 2010 at 11:16 am [Comment permalink]
hey its nice ..i wondered y ppl distinguish between math and bio now reading this i can say its all abt science ...
any thing comes from any subject..:)
3 Feb 2010 at 8:21 am [Comment permalink]
Fantastic ... always looking for great examples and this is explain rather nicely .. thanks for passing this on!
3 Feb 2010 at 10:38 pm [Comment permalink]
Wow! I now understand cleary why overdose of certain drugs can kill a human being.Please continue saving Human lives with such information.
6 Feb 2010 at 4:56 am [Comment permalink]
I see, so that's how the doctors knows how to distribute the drugs to the patients. Thanks for the research, it really broadens up one's mind in terms of how maths apply to daily life
21 Feb 2010 at 5:21 pm [Comment permalink]
nice...very informative....thanks for the information
28 Dec 2010 at 12:56 pm [Comment permalink]
Great. A typical example of using math to explain how things work.
21 Sep 2015 at 5:57 am [Comment permalink]
max occurs around t = 2.23, not 3
22 Sep 2015 at 11:07 am [Comment permalink]
@Peter: Thanks for your feedback. It is qualified by the word "around" and is descriptive, not intended to provide any particular accuracy.
But agreed, it's closer to 2 than 3, so I modified the post.
15 Dec 2015 at 11:19 am [Comment permalink]
Why is the differential equation divided by the volume?
15 Dec 2015 at 12:11 pm [Comment permalink]
@Rafael: In general, the concentration (C) of any substance is the amount (A) of that substance per unit volume (V).
An eye drop of food coloring in a thimble of wine has a much higher concentration than the same eye drop of food coloring placed into a swimming pool.
16 Dec 2015 at 1:26 pm [Comment permalink]
How would you solve this differential equation without using a computer algebra system?
16 Dec 2015 at 2:59 pm [Comment permalink]
@Rafael: This is a first order linear ODE. See: Linear DEs Order 1
Instead of x and y, "t" is the independent variable, and "C" is dependent.
The integrating factor is
So the solution to the DE is:
At the are no drugs in the patient's body, so .
Substituting:
So
Then
Dividing through by and tidying up gives:
I hope it helps.
17 Dec 2015 at 9:29 am [Comment permalink]
How did you get from 53.3 to 533?I understand you divided that side of the equation by e^0.4 but how is the coefficient 53.3 affected?
17 Dec 2015 at 9:46 am [Comment permalink]
And why is e^0.4 still on the left side if you divided e^0.4 on both sides? Thank you.
17 Dec 2015 at 10:21 am [Comment permalink]
@Rafael: I noticed I had a typo in this line
It should have been this (I've amended the post):
The becomes because
For the last part,
Divide through by
Factor and rearrange:
24 May 2016 at 8:19 am [Comment permalink]
What are the units for the concentration at the end? I know it must be something per L or mL...
25 May 2016 at 8:29 pm [Comment permalink]
Jenn
Typical units for this problem would be:
D (mL)
V (mL)
C (mL / kg) (of body mass)
F (unitless)
A (mL / h)
E (mL / h)
t (h)
So the units for C at the end of the problem would be mL / kg.
15 Dec 2016 at 10:20 pm [Comment permalink]
How can F=2? If you have a drug that is 100% effective, then the bioavailability=F=1, which shold be the maximum.
18 Dec 2016 at 11:09 am [Comment permalink]
@William: I can't find anywhere in my article or in anyone's comments where it has F=2, so I don't quite get your point.
9 Feb 2017 at 3:47 pm [Comment permalink]
[…] before calculators came along), exponential growth (of populations, money (compound interest) or drug concentrations over time) and complex numbers (which were used to design the computer or mobile device you are reading this […]
27 Apr 2017 at 7:18 am [Comment permalink]
What does 'volume distributed in the body' mean? The volume of the drug in the body, the volume of the body itself?
Also, could units for drug dosage be change to grams if absorption constant and elimination constant were also changed to grams/hour?
27 Apr 2017 at 3:35 pm [Comment permalink]
@Allie: I think this will answer your first question: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume_of_distribution
Yes, you would be able to change units like this (as long as everything balances out - if it's g/h on the left, it needs to be g/h on the right.)
9 Oct 2017 at 4:22 am [Comment permalink]
You have an error in comment 12, where you found your integrating factor. You included 0.4t in the integral - however, that shouldn't have shown up until the integral, itself. And then again, when you presented the solution to the DE, you included t as a multiple of the constant, rather than a multiple of the exponent.
9 Oct 2017 at 4:45 pm [Comment permalink]
@Bucho: Thanks for pointing out the typos. I've amended them now. (You may need to refresh the page to see the update.)
10 Oct 2017 at 4:36 am [Comment permalink]
No problem. Thanks for doing a good work. Not many people have the ambition, and even fewer have the ability. 😉
17 Oct 2017 at 10:57 am [Comment permalink]
How did you create this graph? Where did you get the x and y values for the graph?
17 Oct 2017 at 7:24 pm [Comment permalink]
@Julia: As it says in the article, I used a computer algebra system to solve the differential equation. You can get Wolfram|Alpha to do it for you (for free), like this:
W|A solution