{"id":9898,"date":"2014-11-28T13:15:22","date_gmt":"2014-11-28T05:15:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/?p=9898"},"modified":"2014-11-28T14:01:57","modified_gmt":"2014-11-28T06:01:57","slug":"geogebra-now-3d-graphs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/mathematics\/geogebra-now-3d-graphs-9898","title":{"rendered":"GeoGebra now with 3D graphs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.geogebra.org\/\">GeoGebra<\/a> released version 5 a few months back. GeoGebra is a powerful and free graphing tool that anyone learning - or teaching - mathematics would find useful. <\/p>\n<p>For me, the  best feature of the new version is the ability to create 3D graphs.<\/p>\n<p>When you first open GeoGebra now, you are greeted with this choice of Perspectives:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/geogebra-interface-1a.png\" alt=\"3D interface in GeoGebra\" width=\"142\" height=\"229\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Choosing &quot;3D Graphics&quot;, you get several new panels, which allow you to create 3D objects like a line perpendicular to a plane, a plane intersecting a cone, a plane through 3 points, a sphere, and so on:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/geogebra-interface-2.png\" alt=\"3D GeoGebra interface\" width=\"398\" height=\"46\" \/><\/p>\n<p>You also get a set of empty 3-D coordinate axes, like this:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/geogebra-coordinates.png\" alt=\"3D coordinate axes\" width=\"371\" height=\"372\" \/> <\/p>\n<p>Of course, you can still create 2D graphs as before, and the interface is largely unchanged for that aspect.<\/p>\n<h2>Some 3D graph examples<\/h2>\n<p>Let's draw a few 3D surfaces using GeoGebra.<\/p>\n<p>Here's a water droplet-like shape, whose equation is:  <\/p>\n<p><em>z<\/em>(<em>x<\/em>, <em>y<\/em>) = 1 + 3 cos((<em>x<\/em><sup>2<\/sup> + <em>y<\/em><sup>2<\/sup>) 2) <em>e<\/em><sup>(-(<em>x<\/em><sup>2<\/sup> + <em>y<\/em><sup>2<\/sup>;))<\/sup><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/droplet.png\" alt=\"water droplet 3D graph using GeoGebra\" width=\"407\" height=\"291\" \/>  <\/p>\n<p>Next, here are some 3D graphs that were suggested by some comments on the article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/mathematics\/how-to-draw-y2-x-2-2301\">How to draw y^2 = x - 2?<\/a> <\/p>\n<p>One reader asked how to draw some graphs involving interesting asymptotes. I used some different software for those ones (which has a problem where asymptotes appear as vertical &quot;walls&quot; - but shouldn't be there at all.<\/p>\n<p>Those graphs are similar to the following ones, which also involve an asymptote: <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"math\"><em>z<\/em> =  <em>y <\/em>\/ <em>x<\/em><sup>2<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/3D-1.png\" alt=\"3D graph z = y\/x^2\" width=\"407\" height=\"291\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Let's consider this curve for a bit (using GeoGebra to help, of course), and investigate it from different angles. <\/p>\n<p>If we fix <span class=\"math\"><em>y<\/em> = 1<\/span> then the curve <span class=\"math\"><em>z<\/em> = 1 \/ <em>x<\/em><sup>2<\/sup><\/span>  (it's in 2 dimensions) looks like this: <\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/zis1onx2.png\" alt=\"3D graph  z = -y\/x^2\" width=\"340\" height=\"270\" \/><\/p>\n<p>We can see this shape in our 3D graph above.<\/p>\n<p>Let's now add the negative of the above graph, that is <span class=\"math\"><em>z<\/em> = &minus;<em>y <\/em>\/ <em>x<\/em><sup>2<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Here's what it looks like, along with our original surface:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/3D-2.png\" alt=\"3D graph  z = x\/y^2\" width=\"410\" height=\"344\" \/> <\/p>\n<p>Next, we'll look at <span class=\"math\"><em>z<\/em> = &minus;<em>x <\/em>\/ <em>y<\/em><sup>2<\/sup><\/span> by itself:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/3D-3.png\" alt=\"3D graph  z = -x\/y^2\" width=\"404\" height=\"291\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Now, we add its negative: <span class=\"math\"><em>z<\/em> = &minus;<em>y <\/em>\/ <em>x<\/em><sup>2<\/sup><\/span> (the one in green): <\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/3D-4.png\" alt=\"3D graph using GeoGebra\" width=\"431\" height=\"344\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Now for all 4 surfaces together:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/3D-6.png\" alt=\"4 surfaces together\" width=\"409\" height=\"349\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Here they are from a different point of view:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/3D-7.png\" alt=\"another view of 4 surfaces\" width=\"339\" height=\"364\" \/> <\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>GeoGebra is a versatile and powerful tool. With this new version, they have addressed some of the shortfalls of earlier versions, since it now handles 3D graphs, and there are non-Java output possibilities so you can view the applets, and interact with them, on your tablet devices.<\/p>\n<p>Trying to imagine surfaces in 3D really pushes your brain envelope - but this tool makes things a lot easier!<\/p>\n<p>Sweet! <\/p>\n<p class=\"alt\">See the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/mathematics\/geogebra-now-3d-graphs-9898#comments\" id=\"comms\">11 Comments<\/a> below.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/mathematics\/geogebra-now-3d-graphs-9898\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-content\/images\/2014\/11\/3D-3_th.png\" alt=\"3D graph using GeoGebra\" width=\"128\" height=\"100\" class=\"imgRt\" \/><\/a><br \/>GeoGebra's latest version offers 3D graphs and output that can be viewed on tablet devices. Here's a quick overview.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[109,127],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9898"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9898"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9898\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9898"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9898"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9898"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}