{"id":12435,"date":"2020-07-03T21:30:57","date_gmt":"2020-07-03T13:30:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/?p=12435"},"modified":"2020-07-03T21:30:57","modified_gmt":"2020-07-03T13:30:57","slug":"simplifying-radical-expressions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/mathematics\/simplifying-radical-expressions-12435","title":{"rendered":"Simplifying Radical Expressions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Before we begin simplifying radical expressions, let\u2019s recall the properties of them. Take a look at the expression below:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3dB_WoJyvffiGDt3gbOageY81G6xw7dX7ieVTvN290UxviHnnLltEBHTev6DSWZoinsDpwJNKU02-Bg3VouCCbOBGU6pFevQKL3pSX7_71vIt6G4zkwSbRcOUmoLLQxWxGHlPC6JH21G2afI_iCdsQu=w22-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"22\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/p>\n<p>Looking at the radical expression above, we can determine that\u00a0<em>X\u00a0<\/em>is the\u00a0<strong><em>radicand<\/em>\u00a0<\/strong>of the expression. Meanwhile, \u221a\u00a0is the\u00a0<strong>radical symbol\u00a0<\/strong>while\u00a0<em>n<\/em>\u00a0is the\u00a0<strong>index<\/strong>. In this case, should you encounter a radical expression that is written like this:<img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/c\/Users\/Ridwan\/AppData\/Local\/Temp\/msohtmlclip1\/01\/clip_image006.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"3\" height=\"19\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3eIBooPIQXiIE5IZs-vzlvvb_-rr9LGz9FZKmY0BE7KOFkPD2jZKj0rW_v6KrKBj6es3lw86Ygtg-Hx4LSFgtnmBdCg1SKzEkyxl4sXdDbQ3QDqxH4AIpWBoHrSLF8G4FssCPHbmuV3Y_StkZCEHEcU=w27-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"27\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/p>\n<p>You can easily tell that the radicand of the expression equals to 25 while the index equals to 2. Radical expressions with the index of 2 are also referred to as square root. Since that is the case, we can hide the index part so it would be written like this:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3dGf-_qtvO1W3ZR0arqNsYYpUNqfo0E8W-Zjwvd-_M-dbm8-8PUpVvWvwnkmGwJ8Gca9R6ACwY9t_BmeyX0xivsHJOziU1Q95f8zQ291wYQL7RcRevv6pkw_RE3JalYsqebGB5AZOPvTiSXvE0RBLy5=w26-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"26\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/p>\n<h2>Basics of Simplifying Expressions<\/h2>\n<p>If we want to simplify the expression above, we can do it like so:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3fKxBwVc1k6wznC-60DJsZJKXDCvsx9oeZhG_DlpTkAjbWcwUMyFezjOF2f5mu4Cmz-7sOm3riOB2B172BObiPHa0tTBieuoDf1l1sXpEtIPZdL_JoS_Lobq2tXnDWZccL4beYGXrADywP3ctBY7O1H=w101-h23-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"101\" height=\"23\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/p>\n<p>Simplifying an expression meaning we are replacing it with an equivalent that is easier to digest and, if possible, shorter. In the example above, the simplification of\u00a0<img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3d0B_I57AY4ao76hpyl_tTHMF1vBh-9_b5wzRgMwezotC4kQDDqmd8g2bDm7q0CxytMG7p7pFbku44bYux2UZRDM0qGMYLNIi40WLzGSByNQ6Wa43nVwTn15ovK_4hbktuZmqbCTPtyvC4QsdGbkhun=w26-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"26\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b\u00a0is 5. If we want to simplify other radicals such as\u00a0<img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3f2wH3pT1lOy5Iy2-v3qJdzZnt7rc7FSWjEuYWiF6LTkhl-3AuaytAeHrtQmh7Zx775S94Rkba1Uc1e-TzqZvg1Pz3b93BsDjDOYRiifVThW3qU-eNq31mSWpoxJ_yDscIITlH2Kd_GzNMA38YpZj-H=w57-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"57\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/c\/Users\/Ridwan\/AppData\/Local\/Temp\/msohtmlclip1\/01\/clip_image016.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"57\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b, and\u00a0<img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3f_Yk9ziuDEQuiL3eeZWF0UHwHbOn6er74hZUbPqUrUsrmN4yLGM1KdGxbDJw_WN1qEad7eCUpcl35AH2SwF-2OhdB2kREs4oVEbNu8bRycedeJEJUxwxlW_sE4d0ZBIVjRkBqdkV2HT4SfuwYFI63d=w26-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"26\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b\u00a0that has\u00a0<em>perfect square<\/em>\u00a0radicands\u201425 is also a perfect square, then the result would be 6, 7, and 4 respectively.<\/p>\n<p>Recall that perfect squares are radicands that have an integer as its square root (e.g. 5, an integer, is the square root of 25). In that case, what if we want to simplify other radicals that don\u2019t have a perfect square as its radicands?<\/p>\n<h2>Simplifying Radicals Expressions with Imperfect Square Radicands<\/h2>\n<p>Imperfect squares are the opposite of perfect squares. As radicands, imperfect squares don\u2019t have an integer as its square root. Instead, the square root would be a number which decimal part would continue on endlessly without end and won\u2019t show any repeating pattern. Here are some examples:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3cCo7494JG4kc_l3ciqEvgUilw6tk_pAY82CsYjmCPXQzZggkT6P2Q2GItHyB0zpQ2ZAILWBxeKE1Za9TTtaK71W9JxJ0xuP9n1JDdq_CrwkLH0vjs-FJ6ecgk1_YuWPgfddI9mMGPTZCFPSJXOXWww=w126-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"126\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/li>\n<li><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3dWERBIR4sWhV213OLhI_5KTyrPINeIbqLeYoblf1CsZzMsX0s7qCorp5-tmyB9pYq8mr_7yFS7APy23vFL9-BTWY9tjpVVQVln-82CaQ2w13TwZbJFx-u4kdmus7wSzEY0vt2XXoyVUjPsSSosyqjz=w126-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"126\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/li>\n<li><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3cIVFjivaSn0jeZeY0dappXPgnpHfV2NDvzuA62EirMXv_nqwMdbndr_R8k4ZpLL6-BlEH9s5He7L4a-uGUy293jRXz3JafzwuSFelwjdRrVijK4D4aIhgg5xme9cFat85rDS1re9aC3hWjT7TtzDve=w126-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"126\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>As you can see, the decimal part of these square roots won\u2019t repeat nor terminate. These numbers can\u2019t even be expressed accurately with fractions of integers. How do we simplify them? To tell you the truth, it\u2019s quite simple.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3cM91c7SoobV2FQZHkxhUIAYKdzL02VPZ8Qk8q511wpDnWolXFhoQjxJk-uVsohuJdNOCgEUj9lTdJkbUF4uZ-cRNePTFH28Q661B8XVxqO8xQMcCPEnaHHh4MBvuG6pKoDc6iK8_weTSsslkCzKqlZ=w133-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"133\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/li>\n<li><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3e3XN4opD3L05lrnyJCUZ4R9jWyQ9CK-2o4oM5Uzwzhsws3TnQ03HzG8Bu3jtkPwnNEgweDobb_sQ43Jrsoox4LcQrc-ixbDrUWI3FiKhMT-22m94yVO1fXKhMYLHq-Iy6OMnBN8BhgsD0EnzJ8c_Ui=w141-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"141\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/li>\n<li><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3fiJRsPgkekF-Hrah_qNzTCVn3SjOqJU2rb-1Uw6zcN5_aAcanLAa2acL5eVuY4rm3XHNdPVIrk2tkQ9z18YTz5oeEQXpgbopneAtfNrT5S_Q9crdsfD4UrobsE1hAIMPm6s1ECHCL1E656Dpg-snYA=w141-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"141\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>How did we do it? Well, in reality, there\u2019s another property of radical expressions, which is the\u00a0<em>Product Rule\u00a0<\/em>of radical expressions.<\/p>\n<h3>The Product Rule of Radical Expressions<\/h3>\n<p>The Product Rule indicates radical expression behavior. That is, if two or more radical expressions with the same index\u2014let\u2019s say\u00a0<em>n<\/em>\u2014are multiplied, the result would be equal to the radical expression of the product between the previous radicands, with the index of\u00a0<em>n<\/em>. To understand it better, consider the equation below:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3cu-kxosWvzjhXrycRKuruvbKjOe99m3r2gG463NUyx7MtUTxmCQuUW3Vto4kT6kP5OfyZPUtOSEGuHcGIayxYqVQ3WIUO2A_T1zKIaDhWTXFniEmcG9LezOFZQNgIsTa4RTUH5qE73Tn3ktDqheeaO=w135-h23-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"135\" height=\"23\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/p>\n<p>With this rule, we can more easily simplify radical expressions that are seemingly complicated like before. Let\u2019s deepen our understanding with a few more examples.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3fHgD7zhWYzyDI9HpVfHNOTvtSrMVzw0n3ZErlmOCfKgsTHSnJxHcl4vlNGtdgL0DOL8waafPE2O3fJ9NCfpkm8P0Fc7LcnIfX4n1AkiOK9-Z68aq2Fhwq2b4FJiEy0lQhbdU8WC5TtMfhA-0kRqoqA=w181-h136-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"181\" height=\"136\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/p>\n<p>From the equation above, we separate the radicand (72) into three different numbers (4, 9, and 2). Afterward, we put each of the numbers into its own radical expressions, then grouped them again into a more manageable form, which is\u00a0<img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3f-wBbbItVed9XKQlI9xPsedVRCab26MLyGZMS0fU12MmVfSHE-d9G465T9v4HjdZMVi1bDgJoy3fpWcLHqikHVUeUAWNWwK15pavu76_2d3icQXFjF712Q_usOxOy-Xzr0mWx6Xb-zITGsCH3aMvcP=w26-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"26\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/c\/Users\/Ridwan\/AppData\/Local\/Temp\/msohtmlclip1\/01\/clip_image044.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"26\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b.<\/p>\n<p>There are multiple ways of simplifying\u00a0<img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3cmcJ2tcPgFz5XwiGh3YZnBXZvQpXtQkRN0j8XYMhVbPRhP9s0HF-PdlkFgutdnY7Ac13woPzWCqpieR3Y9JQEiorL8rGlI9QVyeLQlP-Td8OrgjB6RDXN6ZUSASUlpszyTOoCR9_pks_E6ArGpwavb=w26-h21-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"26\" height=\"21\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b. Can you find the different methods of solving it? Try it!<\/p>\n<p>Once you\u2019ve done, take a look at this one.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3eUAF_FJcpOllx0qXBcIsJSm4mMjIxtb9ICBd9R0eX8_F6tuUnOZE3p_tL4oyLjqcaZ7dsd_mmUWkI5wIAS1gWzZiitg6HMJdkYKazYHdAvVR1rgWmBBpphWu9aKUX9uyihdJg4tE542rQZ-obbcrVE=w232-h158-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"232\" height=\"158\" \/>\u200b<\/p>\n<p>The problem is similar to the one before. The only difference is that we split apart the 4s into two 2s for each, giving it more explanations as to how the radical expressions with the radicands of 4 are simplified.<\/p>\n<h3>The Quotient Rule of Radical Expressions<\/h3>\n<p>The\u00a0<em>Quotient Rule<\/em>\u00a0denotes the property of radicals differently. That is, the division between two or more radical expressions with the same index\u2014let\u2019s say\u00a0<em>n<\/em>\u2014is always equal to the radical expression of the quotient between the previous radicands, with the index of\u00a0<em>n<\/em>. Look at the following:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3c7Hlwa3L0pSdm3I8kCfX0Y68tOsSi9SMwyE4KRFaQMZHO0oWMmpj8g9xhy_Hi9m26SagExSHgbDIF0uAjwppBEbDjbmkXfqgh7QaEi_pQxyPPe0GLSdRg34ST6XD7kmMDyMosDmj3bnJpOmBINjpE4=w66-h53-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"66\" height=\"53\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/p>\n<p>Well, looking simply at the definition will hardly do any good. Let\u2019s sharpen our calculation skill with a couple of examples:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3dt5z_TnqtR_Eznhbd23fCuY6_5IgfaATHRel9s2QrQFyoOSBfZU4jsyXNCrDrfP5l1QRxqAH14hcazOJogQt2Oc0-fy67LRxwpfA7g5Fke-B-dwDJxTTtilHREHbM5RIDtqfkK2xqWeTMkMzDSgaUa=w100-h53-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"53\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/p>\n<p>Voila! The rather convoluted expression of\u00a0<img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3e_9_nPYJGtUzDd5zeGZ1mw4SurQcP6q7WnoE-Xtb1CS3Q2Ca_hagjUXN5u6sDQoRoZoHq3B44psAF68xf-U3o9p_vUsRyGYza7iqvJmXpwfGHoqkgPwwT33sTRPKEPXhivTmi8oBbzF7qTYc_MPZNv=w41-h35-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"41\" height=\"35\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b\u00a0is easily solved using the rule.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s take a look at a more difficult problem:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3edd6SyBAC6djy2eGFjTuVAlVlX2ij1KO68AGSLF_wE26Z-ouTfsFRNDt3csw6Xi82dY25CwHVIasDcl8PZ931-aos6NHJE7toPcDK-xx8zKDiNIM7OckvmlGzriRmQsHelIidxxbQh-qtVIvxMzMio=w137-h416-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"137\" height=\"416\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b<\/p>\n<p>This time, the road we took is longer but it\u2019s actually not that different. Look at the process and you\u2019ll see that it only takes simple calculations.<\/p>\n<p>In case you are wondering, we multiply the equation with\u00a0<img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3fFHtGP23rE6gVBtBjYjOhn8yCfmXyKWC44kzAUpi6jwhqA4kJoHe2uCfH2lw8YlZhJGkC2Jllwn7MIN6KUto00V4Qn9CHUTHgW3O19q_7b_zs1G7Vou9NM_mDJcg-lQzM1WAj-wEDs9oIR6IcKzlQ3=w41-h35-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"41\" height=\"35\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b\u00a0to\u00a0<strong>rationalize the denominator<\/strong>.\u00a0<img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/lh3.googleusercontent.com\/pw\/ACtC-3fFHtGP23rE6gVBtBjYjOhn8yCfmXyKWC44kzAUpi6jwhqA4kJoHe2uCfH2lw8YlZhJGkC2Jllwn7MIN6KUto00V4Qn9CHUTHgW3O19q_7b_zs1G7Vou9NM_mDJcg-lQzM1WAj-wEDs9oIR6IcKzlQ3=w41-h35-no?authuser=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"41\" height=\"35\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/asavana.com\/node\/image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAPABAP\/\/\/wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==\" alt=\"\" width=\"15\" height=\"15\" \/>\u200b\u00a0equals 1, so the figure won\u2019t change the underlying value of the equation if multiplied with it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"alt\"><a href=\"#respond\" id=\"comms\">Be the first to comment<\/a> below.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Before we begin simplifying radical expressions, let\u2019s recall the properties of them. Take a look at the expression below: \u200b Looking at the radical expression above, we can determine that\u00a0X\u00a0is the\u00a0radicand\u00a0of the expression. Meanwhile, \u221a\u00a0is the\u00a0radical symbol\u00a0while\u00a0n\u00a0is the\u00a0index. In this case, should you encounter a radical expression that is written like this:\u200b \u200b You can [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12435"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12435"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12435\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12436,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12435\/revisions\/12436"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}