{"id":10569,"date":"2015-12-08T17:01:08","date_gmt":"2015-12-08T09:01:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/?p=10569"},"modified":"2017-08-18T09:48:24","modified_gmt":"2017-08-18T01:48:24","slug":"reuleaux-triangles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/mathematics\/reuleaux-triangles-10569","title":{"rendered":"Reuleaux triangles"},"content":{"rendered":"

Here's an interesting sculpture made of Reuleaux triangles. <\/p>\n

\"Reuleaux
\n Reuleaux Triangle sculpture [Image source<\/a>]<\/div>\n

What are these triangles and what are they good for? <\/p>\n

How to construct a Reuleaux triangle <\/h2>\n

We begin with an equilateral triangle PQR<\/em> and draw arcs from points P, Q<\/em> and R<\/em> to the opposite two vertices, as follows: <\/p>\n

\"Reuleaux<\/p>\n

Reuleaux Triangle - step 1, extend arcs from vertices <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The resulting Reuleaux triangle has quite "pointy" vertices, and we can make them more round via another step.<\/p>\n

Extend the original triangle with equal length segments through P, Q<\/em> and R<\/em> as follows: <\/p>\n

\"Reuleaux<\/p>\n

Reuleaux Triangle - step 2, extend original triangle <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Next, draw arcs through the new end points, and smaller arcs at the vertices, as follows: <\/p>\n

\"Reuleaux<\/p>\n

Reuleaux Triangle - step 3, extend large and small arcs <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Guitar plectrum<\/h3>\n

The guitarists amongst you will recognize a guitar plectrum looks quite similar to our Reuleaux triangle: <\/p>\n

\"Guitar
\n A guitar plectrum is almost the shape of a Reuleaux triangle
[Image source<\/a>] <\/div>\n

Equal width characteristic <\/h2>\n

One of the interesting characteristics of Reuleaux triangles is they maintain equal width when rotated. <\/p>\n

\"Equal \"Equal \"Equal \"Equal
\n Equal width nature of Reuleaux Triangle - rotated by 15° each time <\/div>\n

Rotary Wankel engine<\/h2>\n

First conceived in Germany in the 1920s and developed through the 1960s and 70s, the Wankel rotary engine<\/a> is based on the equal diameter characteristic mentioned above. Rather than having pistons that compress gas and fire the mixture, the Wankel engine performs the same functions with less moving parts, and less weight. <\/p>\n

\"Wankel
\n Wankel rotary engine. Image source<\/a>] <\/div>\n

I've always thought the Wankel engine was a clever design and made a lot more sense than piston engines, but it never really took off as a serious contender for the car industry. It's found some other uses in motorbikes, aircraft and more recently, Mercedes Benz has used them in the safety belt pre-tensioner system. <\/p>\n

Other equal-width shapes<\/h2>\n

We can construct other shapes that have equal widths when rotated. Here are a few.<\/p>\n

\"Reuleaux \"Reuleaux \"Reuleaux\"Irregular
\n Other Reuleaux shapes based on regular pentagon, septagon and nonagon, with an irregular shaped one as well. <\/div>\n

Bicycle with Reuleaux wheels<\/h3>\n

This Chinese invention has a triangular rear wheel and pentagonal front wheel. It needs a mechanism to separate the frame from the wheel, and it apparently takes a fair bit of extra energy to ride it, but it works. <\/p>\n

\"Bicycle
\nBicycle with Reuleaux wheels.<\/div>\n

Onigiri<\/h3>\n

On another light note, Japanese onigiri (rice balls) are most often presented in a Reuleaux triangle shape:<\/p>\n

\"Japanese
\n Japanese onigiri. Image source<\/a>] <\/div>\n

Christmas tree<\/h3>\n

Being that time of the year, I made this Christmas tree entirely using multiple such triangles: <\/p>\n

\"Reuleaux
\n Reuleaux triangle Christmas tree. <\/div>\n

Related article<\/h3>\n

See also the article on the Butterfly Map of the World<\/a>, based on the same shape. <\/p>\n

Be the first to comment<\/a> below.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\"Reuleaux<\/a>
\nReuleaux triangles have a property similar to circles - they have constant diameter when rotated.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[134],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10569"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10569"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10569\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11265,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10569\/revisions\/11265"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.intmath.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}